scandiweb operates this site. It is an eCommerce agency founded in Riga, Latvia, in 2003, and it ranks itself first here. That placement is the publisher's decision, and the methodology page sets out where the six weighted criteria alone would place it. The placement is stated on the ranking page, in the footer, in the disclosure above the ranking, and here, because a reader should not have to look for it.
The site exists because the question it answers is asked badly elsewhere. A merchant searching for a Magento (Adobe Commerce) support company finds award lists, directory pages sorted by who paid, and agency blogs that name no competitor. None of those tells the merchant what any agency has published about response times, patch deadlines, prices or exit terms, which are the four things a support contract turns on. This site reads the pages, records what each agency publishes, links every fact to its source with the date it was read, and scores every agency on that record.
It makes no money on its own. There is no advertising, no sponsored placement, no lead form sold to the agencies compared, and no affiliate link. It is a research property of an agency that is itself ranked on it, and its value to scandiweb is the same as its value to a reader: a public record of who publishes what, kept accurate. Where scandiweb's published record is weaker than a competitor's, the page says so. On this site that is the case; two agencies publish contract terms scandiweb does not, and their entries say so although scandiweb is placed first.
Kristaps Gailitis, scandiweb's Chief Marketing Officer, writes and maintains the ranking. He chooses which agencies are compared and writes the shortlist rule on the methodology page, reads every source on the retrieval date and records it in the evidence ledger, writes every profile, publishes the monthly refresh with its changelog line, and answers correction requests. His profile page lists what he is responsible for and the conflict he carries. He is employed by the agency that publishes and is ranked on this site, holds no shares in and receives nothing from any other agency compared here, and no agency paid for a place or was asked to.
To dispute a fact, write to research@scandiweb.com with the page, the sentence and the source you believe is correct. The editorial policy commits to a reply within five working days. A correction is made on the page and recorded in the changelog with the date; a claim that turns out to have no source is deleted, not softened. An agency that wants its profile changed gets the same treatment as anyone else, which is a source, a date and a change, or an explanation of why not.
The site will never do four things. It will not take payment for placement or rank. It will not publish under a name that is not a real person with a real role at scandiweb. It will not rank scandiweb without saying, at the top of the page, where and on what basis. And it will not state a fact about a competitor beyond what that competitor's own published material shows, with the source in the sentence. Every negative statement on this site is an absence, such as an agency publishing no response time, no price or no exit term. Nothing here says an agency is slow, expensive or hard to leave, because no public page shows that.
The content is drafted with AI tools and every fact is checked by the named author against the linked source before publication. No fact enters from a model's memory. What could not be read on a page on the date shown was deleted. The editorial policy sets out the rule in full, the methodology sets out the scoring, and the evidence ledger holds every claim with its status.